Outclassed

Class is a dirty concept. It demeans us all. It distorts our children. It undermines the axioms that determine our true ontology. It has no bases in the world of Zen, thus transcendentalism. It has no language structures that hold to it. No consistency theory supports it. That has to matter, and matter macro proper. It has no psychological frame-work that can be demonstrated as a distinct and thus separate class of happenings, rooted in their own bed of atoms. They are not a solipsism onto themselves if you will. That’s what I mean.

There is no epistemic root that supports the concept of class. That has to matter, and macro proper. Think about it. Epistemology is rooted in the realms of a priori thinking. A priori thought is built around the mind, and the fact that it seems to be wired up in a manner that lets us know nature from the inside of its own run, in the subjective bed. Does that make sense? I mean the very fact that I can discern that the empirical universe ‘splits’ into a meta-physical verse is based on the fact that I have the a priori apparatus to see it in this manner. Anyhow, my abstract point is this, everything complex about the way we think; everything pure and ontologically consistent about the way in which we are written by the atoms, rules out the idea of class.

The idea that we are three, very different and distinct ontology’s is just ludicrous.

Now most of you are probably thinking; what is this man on about? I can understand why you would think that. The academic might even argue that I am way off the mark when it comes down to how I use some of the central tenets of philosophy to push my debate forward. I would argue, not a chance. I would argue that it is they who are lost in the convoluted mess that they deem to be philosophy. I would argue that it is they who are stuck on the road as the headless chicken and not I. Oops, sorry, digressing, again.

Where were we? Class is boring. Adults pretending their stations. Actors who refuse to take off the false hat. Diamonds are just stones. The megalomaniacal feeling that has to be supposed in light of how the ego acts. Refusing to humble one self. Playing master over another. Jump doggy. Twisted axiomations. Twisted affirmations. Ill-considerations. The ill-illuminated.

It’s all coming back. Upstairs/downstairs. One might argue that it’s all ready here; that in-fact it never actually went away. And I’d agree. I’m just saying it’s all coming back. Tip your hat, and off the footpath, for sir. Men unable to meet men in their eyes. A maid to scrub my five bathroom floors. Polly’s to put my kettle on. A butler to open my door. My station, her station, our stations. Shoe shine boys on every corner. A pair of shoes worth more than they can earn during their, irrelevant life-time on this earth. Diamonds are just stones.

It’s going to happen whether you like it or not. There’s absolutely nothing I can do about it. Some are asleep, some are awake and simply stuck with it, and yes some are banging their heads against its wall screaming for change. Some are killing. Some are oppressing everyone they have to, to control the new world stage. What can I do? What can I do? What oh what oh what can I do? Yes I know, boring.

Emergent English. How about we start there. Emergent English. I want to talk about it in relation to the queens English. And by the queens English I mean, ‘the up your own arse’ version of it. The version that say’s our way is standard. Our P’ and our Q’. Because that’ essentially what they are saying. Our way is the standard and any other version, however fluent, is inferior.

Emergent English is about the idea that the languages we speak today, are actually running in motion with the evolution of our minds eye, which of itself, is developing around the circumstances it finds itself thriving in. Meaning tomorrow’s language will be more complex and therefore tomorrows language will have to have been reshaped to fit tomorrows thought paradigm. All language will eventually emerge into one structural coherency, and on that day, the queen won’t even exist in word, never mind a standard in anything.

I’m telling you nothing new by telling you that a class ideology demeans us all. All bright people can see this. What I am saying different is that it can be shown now to be the case in pure mathematics too, so there can be no more arguments in defence of it. I am basically saying that it is wrong in relation to all the correct categories of thought that under line and support the whole field of pure mathematics. No axiom for a start can be extended in any direction to fit it. No phenomenological premise supports it. No ontological definition supports it. It negates all the fundamental principles of pure a priori logic. And since there are no dimensional avenues to escape down anywhere, the party’ up.

Probability factors support my claim on every level. Every human mind for example can be constructed around the frame-works that carry geometry in us as a tool. Obviously the apparatus that allows us to define geometry as a coherent structure, is a natural part of us, as we are all equipped naturally to build a house, or follow a path along chosen points. Up, down, sideways, and one builds a temple. It’s why we were able guide our ships by the stars. Anyhow, the geometry of triangles and squares and so on, are really just a development of this geometrical ability that we all possess a priori. That’s what I’m trying to say.

Every human being, with the exception of the mentally disabled mind, has the ability to geometrize, if you will. By that I mean we can all get our heads around squares, squaring things up, square routes, and the geometry of relativity. We can all get our heads around the geometry of dimension. We can all understand the geometry of class, categories, distinctions, and more importantly, bullshit. And on all levels, the probability factors support my case. You can even all kind of get your minds around that.

Kids who spray graffiti on the walls do so because of geometry. Up, down, sideways, and abstract. In-fact, the very fact that we as a species can actually grasp the concept of abstract, is, in relation to the revolution of the human mind evolving, astounding. It’s huge. Huuuuugggggeeee!!! The idea that we can discern our take between a normal frame of reference and an abstract frame is amazing. The idea that you would lower yourself as a person by actually trying to place yourself above another is beyond me. Diamonds are just stones.

Let me get this back on the heavy track. If you are a different class of person than me, then can I assume you mean you are designed by nature in a different package? That you are a different bubble of make-up? Because that is what is being implied after all, is it not? So let’s get down to my business, which is debate. How are you defined in relation to the geometry of mind better than I am? How would you construct a debate in the face of mine? What ontology do you have up your sleeve?

Manifest destiny, Darwin, and me. It just doesn’t figure. Figure it out. Show me the figures. How are you built to understand the construct of an alphabet different than I am? What is your value in relation to mine? Are you wired up to space/time differently too, or is just better genetics? And what phenomenological argument are you offering up in regards to your type, in type of mine? Split that hair along the line for me please. Because you know what; it’s all just so fucking boring. Conventional carnival. The circus of life and not the circle. The three classes. Ha! Scum, necessary, and downwards.

If you are drawing the distinction, then you should at least offer up a debate. Dinky finger out, doesn’t do it for me, none. Using the right fork at the table doesn’t do it for me, none. I want to see the cake in the box. I would like to hear your debate defined around the axioms and postulates that proposition your whole take in the bed of a new existentialism for a start. Because I want too know it as different. I want to see it clear with my own mind. I want you to basically demonstrate distinction, in light of all the class categories of inferential thinking that hold us as a complex in order of our species today, or else fuck off and die somewhere, till your human again.

We must remove class from our ideology if we are to ever heal. Our greatest weapon is intelligence. If they are uppity, make them feel small. Kill the high horse. Stop whipping the dead horse and move with the times. Emerge with me. Top of the food chain.

Peace.

Yap